| Title | Evaluation of Neonatal Services Provided in a Level II NICU Utilizing Hybrid Telemedicine: A Prospective Study. |
| Author(s) | Makkar A, McCoy M, Hallford G, Foulks A, Anderson M, Milam J, Wehrer M, Doerfler E, Szyld E. |
| Source | Telemed J E Health, Vol. 26, No. 2, Pages 176-183 |
| ePub | Epub 2019 Nov 1. |
| DOI | doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0262. |
| Publication Date | 2/1/2020 |
| Abstract | Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of premature infant treatment managed by hybrid telemedicine versus conventional care. Methods: Prospective, noninferiority study comparing outcomes of premature infants at Comanche County Memorial Hospital's (CCMH) Level II neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with outcomes at OU Medical Center's (OUMC) Level IV NICU. All 32-35 weeks gestational age (GA) infants admitted between May 2015 and October 2017 were included. Infants requiring mechanical ventilation >24 h or advanced subspecialty care were excluded. Outcome variables were: length of stay (LOS), respiratory support, and time to full per oral (PO) feeds. Parents at both centers were surveyed about their satisfaction with the care provided. Between-group comparisons were performed by using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. LOS was assessed for normality by using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and robust regression was used to construct a multivariable regression model to test the independent effect of location on LOS. All analyses were performed by using SAS v. 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Results: Data from 85 CCMH and 70 OUMC neonates were analyzed. CCMH neonates had significantly shorter LOS, reached full PO feeds sooner, and had fewer noninvasive ventilation support days. Location had a significant independent effect (p = 0.001) on LOS while controlling for GA, gender, race, surfactant use, inborn/outborn status, and 5-min APGAR scores. CCMH patients had reduced LOS of 3.01 days (95% confidence interval 1.1-4.8) than OUMC patients. Eighty-five surveys at CCMH and 66 at OUMC were analyzed. Compared with CCMH, OUMC parents reported more travel distance difficulties. 92.5% reported telemedicine experience as good or excellent, whereas 1.5% reported it as poor. Conclusion(s): Hybrid telemedicine is a safe and effective way to extend intensive neonatal care to medically underserved areas. Parental satisfaction with use of hybrid telemedicine is high and comparable to conventional care. |