www.neonatology.net

The Hospital Care of Premature Infants

L. E. La Fétra, M.D.,
Associate in Diseases of Children,
Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons;
Visiting Physician to the Children’s Wards, Bellevue Hospital, New York.

Published in Transactions of the American Pediatric Society 28:90-101, 1916.

Treatment

General Management — So far as is possible it is the aim in the general management of the baby to reproduce the conditions of intrauterine life, conditions which the baby should have been entitled to until the ordinary full period of intrauterine development; that is to say, the baby should be kept in an even temperature approximating that of the human body and should be shielded from all sorts of external shocks, whether thermal or mechanical. The skin should be protected from chances of contagion and injury and the eyes should be protected from light. The inhaled air should be moist and comparatively warm and as free as possible from germs, and the food should be such as to require the least possible amount of digestive effort on the part of the baby. To secure as far as possible the conditions mentioned, certain specific factors are of the greatest importance. First, the temperature of the environment. This is much more readily managed in summer than in winter, but with a little care and attention very satisfactory conditions can be obtained, even in any home. The first question that will arise on the part of the family and the physician in the management of a premature baby is whether or not it should be put into an incubator. My experience with most Incubators and their methods of management would lead me to give a decided negative to this question. Incubators are expensive; they are complicated. It is inconvenient to change the baby’s clothing while it is in an incubator, and most of all, an incubator is difficult to ventilate and to keep free from germ contamination. Moreover, to keep the temperature equable in them and the ventilation proper requires a nurse who is thoroughly familiar with the use of the particular incubator installed.

As regards incubators, probably the most satisfactory one up to the present time is that devised by Dr. Edwin B. Cragin and described in the Journal of the American Medical Association for Sept. 12, 1914. Dr. Cragin devised his incubator to overcome the objections he had to others, namely, insufficient air space, insufficient circulation of air and difficulty of maintaining a constant temperature. Accordingly he made his incubator much larger, holding two basins arranged with electric fan to draw through a current of filtered air and made use of a series of electric bulbs for heating. The air is moistened by evaporation of a pan of water placed in the lower part of the incubator. A thermometer and a hygrometer show the heat and moisture. Altogether, however, there are so many disadvantages in the use of incubators, as compared to their advantages, that the plan of setting aside a small room as an incubator room and having that kept at the proper temperature is much more satisfactory in every way. Here the baby does not have to undergo any chilling when the clothing is removed for any purpose.

The most complete incubator rooms have the air drawn in front doors from some uncontaminated source (in cities usually best from the roof) and it is then warmed, filtered and moistened. The temperature of the room is regulated automatically and the degree of the heat can be adjusted. Such an installation is quite expensive. The Babies’ Hospital in New York has such a room which was installed under Dr. Holt’s direction.

At Bellevue Hospital, because of the prospect of entirely new children’s wards, a very simple and inexpensive Premature ward was devised for temporary use. The sunny corner of a ward facing southwest was partitioned off and double windows with transoms were installed and the number of radiators was increased, so as to furnish sufficient heat on the coldest days. Ventilation was secured by means of the transoms and the door leading into the rest of the ward, where three wet nurses and their babies have their beds. The premature room has a capacity of ten cribs, with a cubic air space of 1,000 feet per crib. Moisture for the air is obtained by keeping a large pan of water simmering on an electric stove. After much experimenting we found that the babies do best, as a rule, when the temperature is kept from 76 to 80 F. with a humidity between 60 and 70 percent. Without this degree of moisture the room temperature had to be much higher, and even then the babies’ mouths got very dry, and their appetites and digestion did not seem so good. Very feeble infants are not only wrapped in cotton, but hot water bottles are put at the bottom and sides of the crib until the baby gains enough strength to keep an even temperature without them. Few need the bottles for more than a week.

Incidentally, we have found the warm ward of the greatest advantage in managing feeble infants that are not premature, such as those weighing 6 pounds at 6 months and having a subnormal temperature. On being put into the warm ward the temperature comes up to normal and they soon begin to assimilate and utilize the same food which seemed to be of little use when their temperature was subnormal.

The baby should be handled only when absolutely necessary. For the first few days after the initial anointing with oil there should be no undressing of the baby, the only handling being that necessary to change the gauze diaper. The clothing should be the simplest possible. Babies under 4 pounds are best wrapped in cotton and kept so swathed until the temperature remains constantly at normal and the weight has risen to 4 or 4 1/2 pounds.

After the initial sponge bath and oiling no bath needs to be given for 4 or 5 days; then a sponge bath may be given every other day for a few days, and later every day.

Diet and Method of Administration — Of equal importance with the maintenance of body heat is the diet and its administration. In order, then, to feed these babies we must put the food into their mouths and often even into the stomach. In general, the most satisfactory means of administering the food is to use a Breck feeder. This is a large graduated tube with a rubber bulb at one end and a small nipple at the other. After the warm food is put into the tube, the nipple is inserted into the baby’s mouth, the bulb adjusted and then slight pressure will express a small amount of food through the nipple into the baby’s mouth. This has the advantage of teaching the baby to draw on the nipple, but without exhausting the baby’s strength. Feeding by the medicine dropper is not nearly so satisfactory, because it does not teach the baby the proper movements of the tongue and and because, also, it is a much slower method of administering food. In some cases the baby cannot swallow satisfactorily and then it is necessary to resort to gavage, a very small, soft rubber catheter being passed through the mouth or through the nose. It is found that the baby is less apt to vomit when it is passed through the nose.

The food which is most suitable and requires the least digestive effort on the part of the baby is, of course, breast milk, but even this must usually be diluted and perhaps even predigested. At Bellevue three wet nurses are kept constantly to furnish milk for the premature babies, and often additional breast milk is bought from women in the neighborhood. This is a good charity for both the women and for the hospital baby. In all private cases the effort should be made to secure good breast milk, either obtained from some maternity hospital or better from a wet nurse who is in the house along with her own baby. This last is necessary in order to keep the breast milk from drying up. The milk is to be expressed from the breast two or three times a day and a requisite quantity mixed with either whey, barley water or granum water as a diluent and then fed to the baby from a Breck feeder. The mixture of breast milk which we generally employ in our premature wards in Bellevue Hospital is for the first few days one half whey and one half breast milk, 1 ounce being given every one and one half or two and one half hours, depending on the size of the baby and its stomach capacity. After a few days the strength of the breast milk is increased to three fourths, from 1 ounce to 1 1/2 ounces being given seven or eight times in twenty-four hours. We have had no success with the four-hour interval. On this food the babies will usually gain quite satisfactorily, though at first very slowly, and one should not be discouraged if the increase in weight is not more than 1 1/2 or 2 ounces per week. So long as the baby is comfortable and has a normal temperature one should be quite satisfied with such a gain. Later the breast milk can be increased to full strength and the quantity given in twenty-four hours also increased, so that the baby will be taking 2 ounces every three hours. This should be sufficient food for a baby weighing 4 1/2 or 5 pounds. If it is impossible to obtain breast milk one must then make use of some cow’s milk modification. We have found it most satisfactory to use 6 per cent. top milk as the basis of the modification and to dilute this at first with whey or with a gruel made from Imperial Granum; often both the whey and the granum are used as a diluent. Five ounces of 6 per cent. milk, 10 ounces of whey and 5 ounces Imperial Granum water are used to make up a 20-ounce mixture. To this is added either milk sugar or more often dextrimaltose in quantity from 1/2 ounce to 1 1/2 ounces.

If the baby is very feeble, the food is always boiled to prevent the formation of firm casein curds, and also predigested with a pancreatic extract for the purpose not only of peptonizing, but also for the purpose of emulsifying the fat and converting into maltose part of the dextrin and starch in the diluent. Occasionally we have made use of potassium carbonate, 3 or 4 grains to the day’s feeding, as an alkali to prevent any chance of acidosis, and occasionally also we have made use of sodium citrate, with the idea of hurrying the food through the stomach into the intestines.

The number of calories per kilogram required by premature babies is, as would be expected, much higher than for babies at full term. We have found by experience that giving the usual 100 calories per kilogram seldom results in a satisfactory gain. On the contrary, on account of the greater proportional surface area it is usually necessary to increase the number of calories from 1 1/4 to 1 1/2 times the ordinary requirements. In looking through the charts it is found that most of these premature babies do not gain until the calories per kilogram have reached at least 120 and many times as high as 150 or more per kilogram. As the baby increases in weight and its subcutaneous fat increases, the caloric requirement diminishes, so that by the time the weight of 5 pounds is reached the calories may generally be safely reduced to 110 or 120.

An important accessory apparatus in the premature room is a tank -of oxygen all coupled tip and ready for instant use in case of cyanotic attacks. It often proves life-saving.

Prognosis — As to this, the period of uterogestation is of great importance, but not entirely conclusive. The weight is the best criterion, but we must not despair of even the very smallest babies. If the baby weighs under three pounds, the chances are very poor; every ounce over three pounds improves the prognosis. I have already mentioned cases of babies weighing 2 pounds 3 ounces and 2 pounds 13 ounces that gained most satisfactorily. Another baby on admission when 3 days old weighed 2 pounds 10 ounces, and at the age of 1 1/2 months had gained only I ounce, weighing 2 pounds 11 ounces. It became a very strong, vigorous infant weighing 4 pounds 13 ounces and was graduated from the hospital at the weight of 5 pounds. It must be remarked here that if the baby is over one week old, although very small, it has a much better chance to live, no matter what the weight. The very fact of having survived a week with so small a body augers a very good constitution, and with proper care there is every likelihood that the baby can survive.

Case Reports

Baby J. L. weighed at 10 days 2 pounds 3 ounces, 7 months’ gestation, and was 43 cm. long. At first fed on breast milk one-half strength; later three-fourths breast milk and one-fourth whey, 177 calories, when eight feedings of 1 1/2 ounces were given. It gained well on this to 3 pounds 14 ounces. It then lost 1 ounce; then the food was Peptonized and potassium citrate added. It gained to 3 pounds 1 ounce, when it was put on whole milk 7 in 20 with 2 ounce dextrimaltose, seven feedings of 2 1/2 ounces. On this the baby gained up to 4 pounds 13 1/2 ounces. Then it suffered gonococcous infection and had to be removed from the premature ward for isolation. The infection and the less expert care caused the baby to lose rapidly and it died, weighing 4 pounds 4 ounces.

Discussion

DR. VEEDER: We have a room in the Children’s Hospital in St. Louis similar to the one described by Dr. La Fétra. Our experience, however, has been somewhat different. We have wasted considerable money in trying to get a system of control for this room, and have been unsuccessful. We now open the transom over the top of the window and heat the room by means of radiators, having the nurses watch the temperature carefully. We keep the temperature at 85 F., and do not dress the child except in ordinary infant clothing, leaving it absolutely uncovered on the bed and we do not put it in cotton. We have noted that a great many children will not gain until they have a higher caloric value of the food. At times not 125 calories, but from 170 to 185 calories, seem necessary. The curve of gain is interesting. The babies gain only an ounce or so a week for a month or six weeks, and then begin to gain rapidly on the same food as before. After they have been in the warm room for about two months, the curve flattens out again, and another increase in weight cannot be obtained until the baby is taken from the warm room and placed in the ordinary ward. Then the weight goes up again.

DR. SEDGWICK: Dr. La Fétra has made a statement that I think I shall have to defend for my friend, Dr. J. C. Litzenberg of Minneapolis, who reported, in the section on diseases of children at the Atlantic City meeting of the American Medical Association in 1912, on the four-hour feeding of premature infants. I think that was the first report on the subject made in this country. Since then the newborn work has been transferred from obstetrics to pediatrics in teaching institutions, and we have had charge of the work. We have had success with the four-hour feedings of premature infants. Dr. La Fétra says that he has not. These infants are all well and blooming, and they are doing the same in other parts of the country. Last year Dr. Howland, who is not here, said, “We are doing it now, and it works”; so others get results with the four-hour interval. Of course, we have sometimes to use gavage. It can be done and it has many points in its favor.

DR. LA FÉTRA: In view of the fact that I made a point of our not having succeeded, I should like to have Dr. Sedgwick tell us the technic of the four-hour feeding. I shall be glad to make another trial. Dr. Hoobler and I made a trial in my wards, but we did not succeed in getting enough food into the baby in twenty-four hours by the four-hour feedings.

DR. SEDGWICK: We put in more than the ordinary chart of the stomach contents of premature infants would indicate as possible, for we know that the stomach contents of the infants move on, as we put the infants under the fluoroscope. The amount the child can take does not depend entirely on the anatomy of the stomach. We can get a sufficient number of calories in. We run from 120 to 150, and we have no trouble in getting more in, if necessary.

A point that Dr. Litzenberg brought out particularly was the fact that we have so little vomiting. We always feed these babies now by tubes. It is easier for the baby and easier for the nurse. The baby rests better. We can put more milk in and get the calories wherever we want them.

DR. LA FÉTRA: How much do you put in, and what?

DR. SEDGWICK: We always use breast milk, and put in enough to raise the calories to between 120 and 150. Did I answer your question?

DR. LA FÉTRA: Not exactly. How many ounces or cubic centimeters do you give?

DR. SEDGWICK: We have no rule in regard to that. We usually start with 10 or 15 c.c. five times a day, and raise it as rapidly as possible up to the amount necessary. We have no rule in regard to giving so much at a time. We put in a small amount at first and raise it as rapidly as possible, noting the results in the child.

DR. HOOBLER: I want to speak of the possibility of transferring what has been done in Bellevue Hospital into any home. Is it possible to provide this in a well-ordered home? I tried this out this winter, during very severe weather, with a 4-pound premature child. We were able to maintain the room temperature at the point which Dr. La Fétra has described as being the most satisfactory, with the humidity in proper proportion.

One additional thing we tried, and we believe it excellent for keeping the baby warm. We took a clothes basket and with barrel hoops made a little tent, covering it with a blanket. Under the blanket we hung a couple of ground-glass electric bulbs, and between these bulbs and the baby’s face we hung a large piece of black cloth. We hung a thermometer within the tent, and we could regulate the temperature of the tent perfectly. We tried to keep the room temperature around 75 F., but in very severe weather this was sometimes difficult. We could, however, keep the temperature of the tent up to as high as 90 F., regardless of outdoor conditions. Keeping the baby under these favorable conditions seemed to assist greatly its nutrition.

Table 1. Length of Babies of Various Weights, on the Average.

Weight, PoundsLength, InchesLength, Cm.
1 1/211 to 1228 to 31
213 1/2 to 14 1/234 to 36
2 1/214 to 15 1/236 to 40
315 to 1638 to 41
3 1/215 1/2 to 16 1/239 to 42
416 1/2 to 1842 to 46
518 to 1945 to 48
619 to 2048 to 51
720 to 2150 to 54

Table 2. Premature Infants in Bellevue Hospital, June, 1915, Showing Relation of Weight to Length.

NameGestation
Period,
Mo.
Weight,
Lb. Oz.
Length,
Cm
.
Length,
In.
1. T.3 lb. 4/12 oz.3915 1/2
2. J. T.3 lb. 2 oz.40.516
3. D. C.4 lb. 4/12 oz.4216 3/4
4. J. S.5 lb.4819
5. M. A.4 lb. 8/12 oz.4718 1/2
6. D. A.4 lb. 3 oz.4317
7. L. F.4 lb. 13 oz.45.518
8. T. R. M.4 lb. 13 oz.4718 1/2
9. N. B.4 lb. 1 oz.4718 1/2
10. P.4 lb. 10 oz.4718 1/2
11. C. S.3 lb. 11 oz.44.2517 1/2
12. M. V.4 lb. 3 oz.4819
13. B.62 lb. 12 oz.3815
14. P.72 lb. 2 1/2 oz.3614 1/4
15. S. C.4 lb. 2 oz.4316 3/4
16. F. H.2 lb. 13 oz.37.514 3/4
17. M. V.61 lb. 12 oz.33.513 1/4
18. E.72 lb. 5 1/2 oz.3514
19. C.72 lb. 15 1/2 oz.38.515 1/8
20. A. U.2 lb. 5 1/2 oz.3514
21. No. 7672 lb. 13 oz.16 1/2
22. No. 7663 lb. 4 oz.30 (?)
23. No. 2632 lb. 16 oz.34

Table 3. Data of Infants Cured.

First Weight Lb. Oz.Length, Cm.Discharge Weight, Lb. Oz.Time in Hospital, Mo.Food
4 lb. 6 oz.335 lb. 1 oz.3At first took breast milk 3/4, barley water 1/4. Later 6% 5 in 20 with 1 ounce dextrimaltose.
3 lb.435 lb. 5 oz.4First food breast milk and whey 2/3 to 3/4 strength. Later in conjunction with or entirely 6% 5 in 20, with 1 ounce dextrimaltose.
4 lb. 2 oz.6 lb. 6 oz.4Breast milk gradually changed to top milk modification.
2 lb. 13 1/2 oz.5 lb. 6/12 oz.7One-half strength breast milk alternated with 6% 5 in 20. Later whole milk 7, dextrimaltose 1 1/2, barley water to 24 1/2, with the addition of 1/2 yolk of egg twice daily. 3 1/4 ounces, 7 feedings.
4 lb. 10 oz.5 lb. 4 oz.1 1/4Breast milk gradually changed to top milk modification.
3 lb. 14 oz.5 lb. 1 oz.3 1/2Breast milk and whey, gradually changed to alternation with modified milk, calories 89 to 160. Did best on 140 calories.
3 lb. 15 oz.4 lb. 14 oz.1 1/2Calories 100 to 150.
3 lb. 14 oz.6 lb. 2 oz.2 1/2Breast milk gradually changed to top milk modification.
3 lb. 13 oz.4 lb. 11 oz.1 1/2Baby had bronchopneumonia with temperature up to 104; did best on about 170 calories; took no breast milk; had either modified 6% milk or modified whole milk.
4 lb. 5 oz.4 lb. 6 1/2 oz.After 1 weekBreast milk gradually changed to top milk modification.
4 lb.5 lb. 13 1/2 oz.2At first 6% milk 3 1/2, milk sugar 3/4 and barley water to 16, 2, 8 feedings, 119 calories. Next 6% milk 4 1/2, 2 ounces, 8 feedings, 160 calories. Gained on this to 4 pounds 10 1/2 ounces. Next 7% milk 5 ounces, milk sugar 3/4 to 1, barley water up to 20, 125 calories. Gained on this to 5 pounds 4 ounces.
4 lb. 2 oz.5 lb. 1 oz.2Breast milk gradually changed to top milk modification.
4 lb. 12 oz.5 lb. 9 oz.3/47% milk 5, dextrimaltose 1, Granum water to 20, 2 1/2 ounces, 8 feedings, or 125 calories. Food never changed.
3 lb. 11 oz.4 lb. 15 oz.2Never took any breast milk, but 6% 5 in 20 with dextrimaltose 1 ounce, quantity being increased from 1 to 2 ounces, 8 feedings.

Originally transcribed 9/16/96 / Last modified 9/16/96
Converted to WordPress 11/22/2025

Last Updated on 11/22/25